Indoor Drone Noise Impact on European Buildings: The Role of Façade Insulation and Stand-Off Distance for Urban OperationsPresentation: Session: Session 17: UAS/UAM noise regulations 2 Room: Lecture room B Session start: 11:40 Wed 01 Jul 2026 Marco Oliveira madeoliv@tcd.ie Affifliation: Trinity College Dublin John Kennedy john.kennedy@tcd.ie Affifliation: Trinity College Dublin Topics: - UAS/UAM noise modelling (Main Topics), - Noise propagation and low-noise route planning (Main Topics), - UAS/UAM noise regulations (Main Topics), - Community Impact, Engagement and Perception (Main Topics) Abstract: The integration of drones into European civilian sectors necessitates a comprehensive assessment of their noise effects on both natural and built environments. Although much has been learned about drone noise from aeroacoustic and human-response studies, its direct impact on indoor environments remains poorly understood. This gap is critical, as indoor acoustic quality is a key determinant of occupant health and well-being. Specifically, the penetration of drone noise indoors hinges on the building envelope's design, the drone's operational and emission profile, and its proximity to the structure. This work quantifies the minimum facade sound insulation and stand-off distances required to ensure acoustic comfort in typical European residences from a hovering drone, accounting for variations in construction systems, altitude, and proximity. Using in-flight measurement data, we accurately captured the sound power of a delivery drone with a payload capacity of 2.5 kg. The outdoor noise propagation from a drone to receivers at 2 meters from the façade was modelled. These results were used to model indoor noise levels in a typical bedroom for various facade typologies and to determine the minimum drone-to-facade stand-off distances required to meet a target of 30 dB(A). The findings show that for D2m,nTw ranging from 33 to 40 dB, the required stand-off distance varied dramatically. With windows closed, the required distances ranged from 2.5 meters for Nordic constructions to 37.5 meters for Mediterranean ones. When windows were open, these distances escalated to between 190 and 295 meters, regardless of the facade typology. Furthermore, the persistence of distinct tonal peaks reaching 36 dB(A) at 100 Hz in lightweight building systems, when overall broadband noise targets are met, underscores the potential inadequacy of single-number metrics for characterizing the nature of drone noise. The presented framework provides essential guidelines to inform future urban drone noise regulations. It supports the establishment of evidence-based stand-off distance limits, facade insulation standards, and specific tonal-noise criteria to safeguard indoor acoustic comfort. |